Field service best practices adoption
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000cam a22000004b 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20080025465 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20191202111930.0 | ||
| 008 | 080916s2008 usa|||| ||| ||eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP | ||
| 084 | $a922.112 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080154813$aBand, William A. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aField service best practices adoption$cby William Band with Sharyn Leaver and Mary Ann Rogan |
| 260 | $aCambridge$bForrester Research$c2008 | ||
| 490 | 1 | $aFor Business process & applications professionals | |
| 520 | $aThe authors surveyed 55 business and technology decision-makers and influencers to discover their strengths and weaknesses compared to 11 field service best practices capabilities. They found that adopting field service best practices challenges many organizations that have this function as part of their business model. About one-quarter of the respondents surveyed evaluate their capabilities to make effective field service scheduling decisions to be poor-below average. And about the same proportion believe their mobile field service capabilities to be subpar. Greater integration of field service in the demand and supply chain can drive the conversion of field service operations from a cost center to a profit center | ||
| 650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080593483$aServicio al cliente | |
| 650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080569815$aOrganizaciones | |
| 650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080586461$aModelos de gestión | |
| 650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080602574$aMétodos de evaluación | |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080649838$aLeaver, Sharyn | |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080649845$aRogan, Mary Ann | |
| 710 | 2 | $0MAPA20080436582$aForrester | |
| 830 | 3 | $0MAPA20080648077$aFor Business process & applications professionals |