Best and worst of B2C site design, 2009 : Forrester applies its web site review methodology to 16 major firms
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
---|---|---|---|
LDR | 00000cam a22000004b 4500 | ||
001 | MAP20090056329 | ||
003 | MAP | ||
005 | 20191202111848.0 | ||
008 | 090429s2009 usa|||| ||| ||eng d | ||
040 | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP | ||
084 | $a217 | ||
245 | 0 | 0 | $aBest and worst of B2C site design, 2009$b : Forrester applies its web site review methodology to 16 major firms$cby Adele Sage... [et al.] |
260 | $aCambridge$bForrester Research$c2009 | ||
490 | 1 | $aFor Customer experience professionals | |
520 | $aForrester applied its Web Site Review methodology to the site experiences at 16 firms four each of the largest auto insurers, discount retailers, footwear manufacturers, and online travel agencies. While Expedia received the highest score, all 16 sites failed our usability test. As a group, online travel agencies outperformed other industries, while footwear manufacturers fell to the bottom of the list But we did encounter some good practices along the way, like Allstates auto insurance coverage recommendation tool, Nikes functionality that enables users to customize running shoes, and Expedias easy-to-scan pages. To improve Web site experiences, customer experience professionals should evaluate their own sites experiences and then make the case for site usability investments even in a tough economy | ||
650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080536336$aB2C | |
650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080584771$aDiseño de sistemas | |
650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080560003$aPáginas web | |
650 | 1 | $0MAPA20080602574$aMétodos de evaluación | |
650 | $0MAPA20190001328$aMárketing de la empresa de seguros | ||
700 | 1 | $0MAPA20090013513$aSage, Adele | |
710 | 2 | $0MAPA20080436582$aForrester | |
830 | 0 | $0MAPA20080528355$aFor Customer experience professionals |