Centro de Documentacion de Fundación MAPFRE - Best and worst of phone self-service design, 2009

MAP20090104747

Best and worst of phone self-service design, 2009 / by Adele Sage... [et al.]. — Cambridge : Forrester Research, 2009

(For Customer experience professionals)

Sumario: Forrester applied its IVR Review methodology to the phone self-service experiences at 16 US firms, four each of the largest auto insurers, discount retailers, footwear manufacturers, and online travel agencies. Among the generally weak phone self-service experiences, Nike earned the only passing overall score. As a group, the auto insurers outperformed the other industries, but the last-place industry, discount retailers, lagged the top performers by only two points. Despite the many flaws, we also uncovered several best practices, such as Orbitzs anticipation of customer needs, 21st Century Insurances clear menu options, and Nikes helpful presentation of information. To improve phone self-service experiences, firms shouldevaluate their own IVRs, take advantage of the right applications to manage customer service costs, and design their IVR experiences with other channels in mind

1. Distribución de seguros . 2. Canales de distribución . 3. Marketing estratégico . 4. Servicio al cliente . 5. Atención al cliente . 6. Márketing de la empresa de seguros . I. Sage, Adele . II. Forrester . III. For Customer experience professionals .