Best and worst of email interaction design, 2009 : Forrester applies its email interaction review methodology to 16 major firms

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Best and worst of email interaction design, 2009</title>
<subTitle> : Forrester applies its email interaction review methodology to 16 major firms</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20090013513">
<namePart>Sage, Adele</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20090013513</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<name type="corporate" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080436582">
<namePart>Forrester</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20080436582</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">usa</placeTerm>
</place>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge</placeTerm>
</place>
<publisher>Forrester Research</publisher>
<dateIssued>2009</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">Forrester applied its Email Interaction Review to the email interactions of 16 firms: four each of the largest auto insurers, discount retailers, footwear manufacturers, and online travel agencies. Only one of the 15 companies that actually responded to our emails passed the evaluation: Nike. As a group, footwear manufacturers outperformed other industries, while discount retailers fell to the bottom of the list. We also found a number of best practices, such as Orbitz's in-context link to the privacy policy, Target's proactive explanation of potentially confusing terms, and Expedia's clear instructions for how to respond. To improve email interactions, firms should evaluate their own email experiences</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">by Adele Sage... [et al.]</note>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080584405">
<topic>Correo electrónico</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080609542">
<topic>Canales de distribución</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080593483">
<topic>Servicio al cliente</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20190001328">
<topic>Márketing de la empresa de seguros</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">217</classification>
<relatedItem type="series" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080528355">
<titleInfo>
<title>For Customer experience professionals</title>
</titleInfo>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">090428</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20191202111851.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20090104846</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>