Best and worst of email interaction design, 2009 : Forrester applies its email interaction review methodology to 16 major firms

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam a22000004b 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20090104846</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20191202111851.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">090428s2009    usa||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">217</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Best and worst of email interaction design, 2009</subfield>
      <subfield code="b"> : Forrester applies its email interaction review methodology to 16 major firms</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Adele Sage... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Forrester Research</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2009</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">For Customer experience professionals</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Forrester applied its Email Interaction Review to the email interactions of 16 firms: four each of the largest auto insurers, discount retailers, footwear manufacturers, and online travel agencies. Only one of the 15 companies that actually responded to our emails passed the evaluation: Nike. As a group, footwear manufacturers outperformed other industries, while discount retailers fell to the bottom of the list. We also found a number of best practices, such as Orbitz's in-context link to the privacy policy, Target's proactive explanation of potentially confusing terms, and Expedia's clear instructions for how to respond. To improve email interactions, firms should evaluate their own email experiences</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080584405</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Correo electrónico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080609542</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Canales de distribución</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080593483</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Servicio al cliente</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20190001328</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Márketing de la empresa de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20090013513</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sage, Adele</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080436582</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Forrester</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080528355</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">For Customer experience professionals</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>