Search

Fairness and nanotechnology concern

Recurso electrónico / electronic resource
MARC record
Tag12Value
LDR  00000cab a2200000 4500
001  MAP20110074722
003  MAP
005  20120119111111.0
008  111229e20111101usa|||p |0|||b|eng d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa‎$d‎MAP
084  ‎$a‎7
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080287894‎$a‎McComas, Katherine A.
24500‎$a‎Fairness and nanotechnology concern‎$c‎Katherine A McComas, John C. Besley
520  ‎$a‎Research suggests that fairness perceptions matter to people who are asked to evaluate the acceptability of risks or risk management. Two separate national random surveys (n = 305 and n = 529) addressed Americans concerns about and acceptance of nanotechnology risk management in the context of the degree to which they view scientists and risk managers as fair. The ?rst survey investigated general views about scientists across four proposed dimensions of fairness (distributional, procedural, interpersonal, and informational). The results show that respondents who believe that the outcomes of scienti?c research tend to result in unequal bene?ts (distributional fairness) and that the procedures meant to protect the public from scienti?c research are biased (procedural fairness) were more concerned about nanotechnology. Believing scientists would treat them with respect (interpersonal fairness) and ensure access to information (informational fairness) were not signi?cant predictors of concern. The second study also looked at these four dimensions of fairness but focused on perceptions of risk managers working for government, universities, and major companies. In addition to concern, it also examined acceptance of nanotechnology risk management. Study 2 results were similar to those of study 1 for concern; however, only perceived informational fairness consistently predicted acceptance of nanotechnology risk management. Overall, the study points to the value of considering fairness perceptions in the study of public perceptions of nanotechnology.
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080569709‎$a‎Nanotecnología
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080596590‎$a‎Evolución científica
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080587628‎$a‎Riesgo tecnológico
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080588953‎$a‎Análisis de riesgos
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080591182‎$a‎Gerencia de riesgos
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080547882‎$a‎Justicia
7730 ‎$w‎MAP20077000345‎$t‎Risk analysis : an international journal‎$d‎McLean, Virginia : Society for Risk Analysis, 1987-2015‎$x‎0272-4332‎$g‎01/11/2011 Tomo 31 Número 11 - 2011 , p. 1749-1761