Life catastrophe benchmarking study 2013 : global comparison of live catastrophe covers

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Aon Benfield</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: XL per-event remains the favourite type of life catastrophe cover: 90% of the observed treaties -- The number of companies not buying any life catastrophe protection is decreasing, as European companies prepare for Solvency II: from 22% in 2011 to 17% in 2013 -- The capacity purchased in Europe for XL per-event has constantly grown since 2010: by +17% between 2010 and 2013, reaching EUR 6.6 billion in 2013 -- The earthquake and tsunami that occurred in March 2011 have impacted the Japanese market: +10% in Rate On Line (ROL) between April 2012 and April 2010</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/144702.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>AON Benfield</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Reaseguro</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Mercado de reaseguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Catástrofes naturales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Seguro de vida</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Reaseguro de exceso de pérdida</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Coberturas</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Books</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Life catastrophe benchmarking study 2013 : global comparison of live catastrophe covers</dc:title>
<dc:coverage xml:lang="es">Ámbito geográfico: Internacional</dc:coverage>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>