Search

The World's most admired companies

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20170007197</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20170309111539.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">170302e20170320usa|||p      |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">922.112.1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The World's most admired companies</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Nobody can quantify the value of a good reputation. But nobody wants to lose one. Just ask Wells Fargo, whose practice of opening accounts without permission tarnished its formerly gleaming name, sending it plunging off Fortune's list of the World's Most Admired Companies this year. [Volkswagen and Chipotle suffered the same fate last year.] The happier news? Surging rankings for Microsoft, which tops an industry category for the first time since 2003, as well as for Facebook, Netflix, and Salesforce. A few companies, such as 3M and McDonald's, made their way back onto the All-Star list, proving that, though it may not be easy, it's possible to restore a reputation.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="522" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Internacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="522" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Internacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608361</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Reputación empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080572389</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Imagen de marca</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591236</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gestión de la marca</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602406</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Marketing estratégico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080545185</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ranking</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077100192</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Fortune</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Time Warner Publishing, 1999-</subfield>
      <subfield code="x">0738-5587</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">20/03/2017 Volumen 175 Número 3 - 1 marzo 2017 , p. 39-44</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>