Search

Means testing adult social care in England

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Means testing adult social care in England</title>
</titleInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">che</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2017</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<extent>30 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">With the number of U.K. citizens aged 75 and over doubling to 10 million by 2040, social care funding remains a key policy challenge. The Care Act 2014 included reforms designed to make care funding sustainable, by establishing a new level for what individuals and the state will pay in England. However, the Government has postponed their introduction until 2020 amid concerns about cost. This paper uses the delay to investigate the current and proposed means testing formulae and finds fault with both. It proposes an alternative formula called the "preferred formula", which it argues is fairer and does not require capital limits. It further suggests that the proposed life-time cap care on costs is unnecessary since the preferred formula contains a mechanism that automatically limits asset depletion. Using examples, the research tackles an issue with all means testing which is that it disincentivises saving, so preventing more money entering the care system.</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Les Mayhew</note>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080625597">
<topic>Envejecimiento de la población</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080579029">
<topic>Asistencia social</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080562533">
<topic>Financiación</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080638290">
<geographic>Reino Unido</geographic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">40</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</publisher>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="issn">1018-5895</identifier>
<identifier type="local">MAP20077100215</identifier>
<part>
<text>03/07/2017 Volumen 42 Número 3 - julio 2017 , p. 500-529</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">170821</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20170825124138.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20170026945</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>