Escaping the triangle

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Parizas, Yiannis </dc:creator>
<dc:date>2019-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: When calculating claims reserves, the market practice is to use development triangles, or modifications of this method. Recent research has suggested that non-triangle techniques are more accurate, especially for estimating reserver volatility. Estimation of Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) for monitoring and pricing purposes often requires drilling down into data segments. Those estimations could significantly benefit from a non-triangle method. However, the market is reluctant to abandon triangle techniques, due to their satisfactory levels of accuracy and simplicity. This article examines a new triangle-free methodology for modelling IBNR claims, and explains how and where the method can be practically applied and its benefits.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/171407.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">IBNR</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Siniestros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Gestión de siniestros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Provisiones para siniestros pendientes de declaración</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Escaping the triangle</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: The Actuary : the magazine of the Institute & Faculty of Actuaries. - London :  Redactive Publishing, 2019-. - 03/06/2019 Número 5 - june 2019 , p. 24-26</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>