An Examination of catastrophes, insurance guaranty funds
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20200022817</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20200707143530.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">200707e20200401che|||p |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">214</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080027780</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Kelly, Mary</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3">
<subfield code="a">An Examination of catastrophes, insurance guaranty funds</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Mary Kelly, Anne Kleffner, Grant Kelly</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Many countries have formalised solvency insurance programmes that provide payments to policyholders of insolvent insurers. Like most insurance schemes, these programmes operate most effectively when failures are firm- specific. Using Canada as a case study, we examine the issue of using ex post guaranty fund assessments following a peak peril loss resulting in the simultaneous failure of multiple insurers. In this case, the guaranty fund assessment levied on surviving insurers is so large that it causes a contagion effect: several insurers fail because of the asessment, and the end result is the collapse of the entire industry. We conclude with a discussion of possible policy alternatives to address this issue, including increasing prudential requirements, changing the ex post funding mechanism, prefunding the guaranty fund for a peak peril loss , using the government as the insurer of large catastrophic losses, or developing public-private partnerships. We highlight both prudential and public policy implications of each of these alternatives and make recommendations for countries that face a large peak peril relative to the size of the private insurance industry.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080585334</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Fondos de garantía</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080590567</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Empresas de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080586294</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mercado de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080552701</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Solvencia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591007</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Fondo de Catástrofe</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080637712</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Canadá</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080197230</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Kleffner, Anne E.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20200015550</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Kelly, Grant </subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077100215</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1018-5895</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/04/2020 Volumen 45 Número 2 - abril 2020 , p. 256-280</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>