Risk appetite : taking and accepting the right amount of risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cam a22000004b 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20220016070</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20220531164019.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200324s2022    aus||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Risk appetite</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: taking and accepting the right amount of risk</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Sydney </subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Protecht</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">13 p.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The explicit reference to an organisational risk appetite has been around for a relatively short while. The concept of risk appetite, however, has implicitly been around forever. Like most aspects of risk management, there are the those that love risk appetite and those that loathe it and all those in between. These diverse views are healthy as they create intelligent debate. Regardless of the many risk expert arguments for and against risk appetite, the ultimate test must be: Does it add value? </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Introduction -- Evolution of the Maturity Process -- What are the benefits of growing up -- What does growing up look like? -- Discrete levels of Maturity -- The steps in using a maturity model approach to developing your EBM</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20130008165</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Apetito de riesgo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588953</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Análisis de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601522</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080617141</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Identificación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20200006343</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Protecht</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>