Make safety a big deal in small companies : even small firms can't afford to ignore safety

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071014541</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418113909.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">930705e19930601usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080170462</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mallowe, Michael</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Make safety a big deal in small companies</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: even small firms can't afford to ignore safety</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Mike Mallowe</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The small businesses really have a much better chance of assuring workplace safety than a larger company. It's all a question of scale. A smaller shop certainly does not equal lesser hazards. But it makes sense that the more manageable the workplace, the better off you can be, from a safety point of view. The first step that experts recommend is the type of "safety audit" that identifies and catalogues the number of employees, their job description, the type of equipment they use and the hazard potential in their work spaces</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629724</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080620080</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Pequeñas y medianas empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605155</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Condiciones de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080614942</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Prevención de accidentes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608095</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Programas de seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Safety & health</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Safety & health</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Itasca</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 6, June 1993 ; p. 68-71</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>