Comparison of a fibrous aerosol monitor (FAM) with the membrane filter method for measuring airborne asbestos concentrations
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071017576 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418115114.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 940223s1986 gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 035 | $a6800003376 | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a872 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080012618$aIles, P.J. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aComparison of a fibrous aerosol monitor (FAM) with the membrane filter method for measuring airborne asbestos concentrations$cJ.P. Iles and T. Shenton-Taylor |
| 520 | $aAn early production model of the Fibrous Aerosol Monitor (FAM) has been compared with the membrane filter method, mainly for chrysolite aerosols. Correlation in laboratory trials was fairly good, but is was generally too poor in the workplaces studied for the FAM to be considered as a substitute for the membrane filter method. The FAM could be used for detecting concentration changes of a dust cloud constant composition, but by this criterion it performed little better than a non-discriminating optical particle counter | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080585679$aHigiene industrial |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080605278$aContaminantes químicos |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080542832$aAmianto |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080549534$aAerosoles |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080616441$aContaminación atmosférica |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080621186$aControl de la contaminación |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080536695$aMFM |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080536541$aFAM |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080559670$aMuestreador |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080601492$aEstudios comparativos |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080232894$aShenton-Taylor, T. | |
| 740 | 4 | $aThe Annals of occupational hygiene | |
| 773 | 0 | $tThe Annals of occupational hygiene$dOxford [etc.]$gnº 1, 1986 ; p. 77-87 |