Search

Field comparison of respirable dust samplers

Fichero PDF / PDF file
MARC record
Tag12Value
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071017901
003  MAP
005  20080418115230.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  940314e19920201gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
035  ‎$a‎6800003256
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎872
24510‎$a‎Field comparison of respirable dust samplers‎$c‎D.K. Verma... [et al.]
520  ‎$a‎Six airborne dust sampling systems were compared side-by-side, as static samplers, in an Ontario uranium mine to evaluate their relative efficiency in an underground environment. Duplicate samplers were included to verify reproducibility. The effect of changing the filters media was evaluated for some of the samplers. Two samplers were also compared in a gold mine. The nyloncyclone is shown to be an acceptable respirable dust sampler for the Ontario hardrock mining environment. Furthermore, it gave results comparable to those of the SIMPEDS metal cyclone. The SIMPEDS and BCIRA metal cyclones, which were expected to give equivalent results measured significantly different dust concentrations. The MRE gave a higher dust concentration measurement than the nylon cyclone, although the samplers appeared to be statistically equivalent
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080585679‎$a‎Higiene industrial
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080605278‎$a‎Contaminantes químicos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080616441‎$a‎Contaminación atmosférica
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080539566‎$a‎Polvo
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080551797‎$a‎Muestreos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080559670‎$a‎Muestreador
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080621186‎$a‎Control de la contaminación
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080544638‎$a‎Minería
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080548308‎$a‎MRE 113A
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080540494‎$a‎Canadá
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080118716‎$a‎Verma, Dave K.
7404 ‎$a‎The Annals of occupational hygiene
7730 ‎$t‎The Annals of occupational hygiene‎$d‎Oxford [etc.]‎$g‎nº 1, February 1992 ; p. 23-34