Comparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071018014 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418115256.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 940315e19920601gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 035 | $a6800012636 | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a872 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080273231$aRoberson, Kenneth T. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aComparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA$cKenneth T. Roberson, Thomas C. Thomas and Larry R. Sherman |
| 520 | $aBecause occupational air samples submitted to this laboratory for fibre counting often need to be confirmed as to the type of asbestos, random air samples were compared by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to determine if both methods yielded comparable resulsts. The results of this study revealed neither and advantage nor a disadvantage for confirmatory analyses of asbestos by either SEM or TEM. Several distinct characteristics were observed during the study | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080585679$aHigiene industrial |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080605278$aContaminantes químicos |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080542832$aAmianto |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080551797$aMuestreos |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080537005$aSEM |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080537050$aTEM |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080537463$aEDXA |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080591960$aMétodos de análisis |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080601492$aEstudios comparativos |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080208578$aThomas, Thomas C. | |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080207045$aSherman, Larry R. | |
| 740 | 4 | $aThe Annals of occupational hygiene | |
| 773 | 0 | $tThe Annals of occupational hygiene$dOxford [etc.]$gnº 3, June 1992 ; p. 265-269 |