Comparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Roberson, Kenneth T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Thomas, Thomas C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sherman, Larry R.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1992-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Because occupational air samples submitted to this laboratory for fibre counting often need to be confirmed as to the type of asbestos, random air samples were compared by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to determine if both methods yielded comparable resulsts. The results of this study revealed neither and advantage nor a disadvantage for confirmatory analyses of asbestos by either SEM or TEM. Several distinct characteristics were observed during the study</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/46171.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Higiene industrial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Contaminantes químicos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Amianto</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Muestreos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">SEM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">TEM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">EDXA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos de análisis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estudios comparativos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Comparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: The Annals of occupational hygiene</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: The Annals of occupational hygiene. - Oxford [etc.]. - nº 3, June 1992 ; p. 265-269</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>