The Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071019531</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115832.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940602e19901201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013266</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">J. Stevenson... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to determine if protocol constraints affected scores on a box-lifting task; (2) to identify any differences in impact of protocol changes on male and female scores; and (3) to determine if these protocol changes affected correlations between maximal box-lifting scores and maximal scores obtained on isoinertial lifting tests. It was concluded that the Incremental lifting machine (ILM) was unable to predict female lifting capabilities accurately using any of three protocols</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080557348</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Biomecánica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080572297</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Fuerza muscular</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570873</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080589462</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Carga de materiales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080539948</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Tests</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080552282</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Protocolo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080551797</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Muestreos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080149499</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Stevenson, J.M.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 33, nº 12, December 1990 ; p. 1455-1469</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>