Search

Quantification of bypass leakage in two different filter cassettes during welding fume sampling

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071021780</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120549.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">950220e19941001usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013263</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">872</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Quantification of bypass leakage in two different filter cassettes during welding fume sampling</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">David Johannes Van den Heever</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The objective of this study was to quantify such bypass leakage, using 37-mm diameter cellulose nitrate filters in a laboratory environment, on two different dust-collecting cassettes. A further objective was the quantification of the percentage dust loss correlated to the vacuum loss resulting from bypass leakage</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585679</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Higiene industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080551797</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Muestreos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588946</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ambiente de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080565954</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Humos tóxicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586355</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de control</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080543969</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Filtros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080627256</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos cuantitativos de medida</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080176440</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Reist, Parker C.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Akron, Ohio</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 55, nº 10, October 1994 ; p. 966-969</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>