Effectiveness of glue odour as a warning signal

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071025233</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121147.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960628e19951101gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080025809</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Hatem, Aida</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Effectiveness of glue odour as a warning signal</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Aida Hatem, Mark Lehto</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This study evaluated glue warnings provided to undergraduates. Experiment texted four warning conditions: no warning, a strong odour, warning text, and warning text and odour. In experiment subjects performed tasks requiring the use of glue. The intent of the experiment was to observe, in a naturalistic environment, how different types of warnings influenced compliance and how the effects varied as a function of the task performed</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080554293</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Etiquetado</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540814</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Diseño</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599119</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Señales de seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080541934</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Olores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600389</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Comportamiento humano</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080028473</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Lehto, Mark</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 38, nº 11, November, 1995 ; p. 2250-2261</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>