Influence of two different modes of resistance training in female subjects
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
---|---|---|---|
LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
001 | MAP20071026129 | ||
003 | MAP | ||
005 | 20080418121336.0 | ||
007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
008 | 961023e19960601gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
084 | $a875 | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | $aInfluence of two different modes of resistance training in female subjects$cHikaru Hisaeda... [et al.] |
520 | $aIn resistance training, it has been empirically accepted that muscle hypertrophy is developed by low intensity and high volume training, while muscle strength and power are developed by high intensity and low volume training. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of two different modes of resistance training on isokinetic strength and muscle cross-sectional area in females | ||
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080550653$aErgonomía |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080572297$aFuerza muscular |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080575731$aEjercicio físico |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080560478$aResistencia |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080544690$aMujeres |
700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080134471$aHisaeda, Hikaru | |
740 | 0 | $aErgonomics | |
773 | 0 | $tErgonomics$dLondon and Washington$gVol. 39, nº 6, June 1996 ; p. 842-852 |