Developing realistic scenarios for the environment : lessons from Brent Spar

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Elkington, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Trisoglio, Alex</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1996-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Why did Shell find itself so badly adrift with the Brent Spar? And why, later in 1995, was it wrong-footed again in Nigeria? The answers reflect deep currents already clear to the company's scenario writers in the 1980s, but retaining their ability to surprise. The authors conclude that Shell's scenarios have been "individualist", "hierarchist" or some combinationn of the two; none have adopted an "egalitarian perspective". They also suggest that the "values shift" scenario -developed for European Partners for the Environment- may hold clues to future shifts in business strategy</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/50685.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Shell</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estrategia empresarial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Cambio organizativo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Planificación estratégica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Management estratégico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Casos prácticos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Developing realistic scenarios for the environment : lessons from Brent Spar</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Long range planning</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Long range planning. - Oxford [etc.]. - Vol. 29, nº 6, December 1996 ; p. 762-769</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>