Operationalizing strategy through process
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20071029215</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20080418121923.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">980120e19971001gbr|||| | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">922.111</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080097165</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Edwards, Chris</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Operationalizing strategy through process</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Chris Edwards and Joe Peppard</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The application of business process reengineering in organizations continues unabated. A central issue that has not been sufficiently considered is the method of identifying and choosing the processes which should be reengineered. If the claimed benefits of substantial performance improvement are to be secured, it is vital that a classification of process exists to facilitate selection of those most likely to deliver such benefits. This article considers the need for such a classification and the responses currently available in the literature, and concludes that this is both a critical and a neglected matter. A classification scheme explicity linking processes to business strategy is presented. The article concludes by illustrating how the scheme was employed by one organization during its re-engineering initiative to yield significant benefit</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080620332</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Reingeniería de la empresa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080569815</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Organizaciones</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080594688</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Análisis estratégico</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080613815</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Diseño de organizaciones</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080610739</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estructura organizativa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080589417</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Cambio organizativo</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080053215</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Peppard, Joe</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Long range planning</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="t">Long range planning</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Oxford [etc.]</subfield>
<subfield code="g">Vol. 30, nº 5, October 1997 ; p. 753-767</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>