Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies : common measurement metrics for exposure assessment

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Wells, R.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1997-01-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: There are many possible means of determining exposure ranging from self-reports of physical exposure to measures of muscle activations and estimated spinal loads. In epidemiologic studies, issues of validity make instrumented measures preferable, however issues of cost and practicability tend to force investigators to less costly but less valid and less reliable measures of exposure, such as self-report questionnaires. This paper presents a method by which estimates of exposure from self-report questionnaires, expert observers, work sampling, video analysis and electromyograms can be reported in a common metric</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/51912.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo físico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Carga de materiales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Fuerza muscular</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Carga física</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Columna vertebral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Epidemiología</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos cuantitativos de medida</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies : common measurement metrics for exposure assessment</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London [etc.]. - Vol. 40, nº 1, January 1997 ; p. 51-61</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>