Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071500008</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418122124.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">981111e19970301gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">896.1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080143374</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Parasuraman, R.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">R. Parasuraman, P.A. Hancock and O. Olofinboba</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The potential use of systems that seek to communicate a warning of impending collision directly to the driver is examined. As a result, only a small proportion of alarms will represent true collision scenarios. These and other factors can conspire to reduce alarm effectiveness in collision-warning systems. The problem is illustrated analytically and potential solutions are advanced</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570569</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad vial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599751</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Accidentes de tráfico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080614942</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Prevención de accidentes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080616786</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dispositivos de seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586546</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Nuevas tecnologías</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564216</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistema IVHS</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080542733</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Alarmas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080071066</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Hancock, P.A.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080110666</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Olofinboba, O.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 40 nº 3, March 1997 ; p. 390-399</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>