comparing speech versus text displays for alarm handling

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071500084</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418122203.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">981209e19971101gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080085223</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Stanton, N.A.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">comparing speech versus text displays for alarm handling</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">N.A. Stanton and C. Baber</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Int this paper an experimental comparison of speech-based and text-based displays for representation of alarms is reported. The findings show that speech leads to longer response times than text displays, but that is has minimal effect on the efficacy of fault handling. The results are discussed within the alarm initiated activities framework and implications for alarm system design are outlined</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540814</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Diseño</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080542733</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Alarmas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080589844</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Control de procesos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080593568</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistemas de control</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601492</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estudios comparativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080003227</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Baber, C.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 40, nº 11, November 1997 ; p. 1240-1254</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>