Search

CEO succession research : methodological bridges over troubled waters

Fichero PDF / PDF file
MARC record
Tag12Value
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071501143
003  MAP
005  20080418122652.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  001009e20000601gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎922.12
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080203610‎$a‎Pitcher, Patricia
24510‎$a‎CEO succession research‎$b‎: methodological bridges over troubled waters‎$c‎Patricia Pitcher, Samia Chreim and Veronika Kisfalvi
5208 ‎$a‎Disappointed by the lack of consistent and robust findings, scholars suspect that the problems may be related to our research methods and have frequently called for longitudinal, clinical, and psychometric studies of succesion. This article compares the findings from one such study with representative studies in the literature. Examining the operationalization of key variables used to study succession antecedents, processes, and organizational consequences, it reveals possible reasons for the disappointing results and suggests ways of strengthening those operationalizations. In addition to suggesting refinements in the measurement of performance, the comparative exercise demonstrates why current proxies for personality and power may create difficulty. It concludes that both field and large-sample research stand to benefit from a closer collaboration
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080605742‎$a‎Directivos de empresas
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080600938‎$a‎Dirección de empresas
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080609627‎$a‎Chief Executive Officer
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080595890‎$a‎Desarrollo directivo
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080591960‎$a‎Métodos de análisis
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080065287‎$a‎Chreim, Samia
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080223052‎$a‎Kisfalvi, Veronika
7730 ‎$w‎MAP20077100307‎$t‎Strategic management journal‎$d‎Chichester [etc.] : Wiley‎$g‎Vol. 21, nº 6, June 2000 ; p. 625-648