Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071501947</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418123031.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">961030e20001201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080005191</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Kanis, H.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">H. Kanis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper focuses on the analysis of deviation in findings within ergonomics-human factors research. The current terms used to address the analysis of deviation in empirical research revolve around the notion of validity. In E-HF research papers, "validity" is widely interpreted and includes its common parlance usage. The possibility is discussed that, with or without the help of these syntaxes, validation may become a method of inquiry; a productive means generating significant theoretical questions which bear directly on empirical work</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588465</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo repetitivo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080565626</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Factor humano</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080556891</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Validación</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080607289</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos experimentales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 45, nº 12, December 2000 ; p. 1947-1965.</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>