Social processes and group decision making : anonymity in group decision support systems

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071503062</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20220912095721.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">021211e20000801gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">874</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080053765</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Postmes, Tom</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Social processes and group decision making</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: anonymity in group decision support systems</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Ton Postmes, Martin Lea</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Various social processes in decision-making groups are considered detrimental to the quality of decision. It is often assumed that removing the ability for groups to exert strong social influence on its members improves group decisions. Group Decision Support Systems (GDSSs) are systems, anonymity is seen as tool to reduce the impact of the group over its members, and therefore as the key to improved group performance. This meta-analytic article examines the assumption that anonymity in DGSSs is benefical for group decision-making on a range of performance indicators</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585051</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Equipos de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080622435</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Toma de decisiones en grupo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080595357</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Comunicación interna</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080583064</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo en equipo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619459</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Efectividad organizacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599973</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Aspectos psicológicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080028350</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Lea, Martin</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 43, nº 8, August 2000 ; p. 1252-1274</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>