Why hierarchies thrive

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071503398</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418123815.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">030312e20030301usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">922.12</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080223755</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Leavitt, Harold J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Why hierarchies thrive</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Harold J. Leavitt</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Hierarchy fills deep human needs, but can easily become poisonous if leaders don't understand how others see their power. This article is neither a defense of hierarchies nor another attack on them. It is reality check, a reminder that hierarchy remains the basic structure of most if not all, large, ongoing human organizations. It is also an examination of why hierarchies persist and even thrive</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080606114</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estructura empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080603977</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistemas de dirección</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600938</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dirección de empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080598204</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Política empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080621452</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gestión de recursos humanos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080546991</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619459</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Efectividad organizacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600945</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dirección estratégica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Harvard business review</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077100345</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Harvard business review</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Boston</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">March 2003 ; p. 96-102</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>