The Asbestos case : a comment on the appointment and use of nonpartisan experts in Word Trade Organization dispute resolution involving health risk
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071505373 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418124619.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 040601e20040401usa|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a872 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080280062$aCarruth, Russellyn S. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | $aThe Asbestos case$b: a comment on the appointment and use of nonpartisan experts in Word Trade Organization dispute resolution involving health risk$cRussellyn S. Carruth, Bernard D. Goldstein |
| 520 | 8 | $aThe purpose of this article is to examine and critique the Asbestos Case as a model for how World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute-resolution panels obtain impartial scientific imput for their decision processes, particulary concerning health risk. As globalization increases and multinational trade becomes more important to national economics, so does the importance of the WTO as a mechanism for adjudicating trade disputes among its members. The credibility of the WTO dispute-resolution process in cases involving complex scientific issues is dependent upon the Panel's marshaling and applying the best scientific evidence | |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080542832$aAmianto |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080619480$aEnfermedades profesionales |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080585679$aHigiene industrial |
| 650 | 0 | 1 | $0MAPA20080588953$aAnálisis de riesgos |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080283353$aGoldstein, Bernard D. | |
| 740 | 0 | $aRisk analysis : an international journal | |
| 773 | 0 | $wMAP20077000345$tRisk analysis : an international journal$dNew York and London$gnº 2, April 2004 ; p. 471-481 |