Assessing compliance with 60-hertz magnetic-field exposure guidelines

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Patterson, Robert M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bracken, T. Dan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Alldredge, Richard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>American Industrial Hygiene Association</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-01-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Exposure limits for magnetic fields in the extremely low frequency range (3 to 3000 hertz) have been established by a number of organizations. The limits are generally intended to prevent overstimulation of electrically sensitive tissue and are expressed as ceiling values-levels not to be exceeded even momentarily. Exposures near or above the limits occur around high-current equipment and often  have large spatial and temporal variability</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/58549.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Higiene industrial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Contaminación radiológica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Electromagnetismo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos de evaluación</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Campos electromagnéticos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Valores Límite Ambientales</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Assessing compliance with 60-hertz magnetic-field exposure guidelines</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. - Cincinnati, Ohio : American Industrial Hygiene Association : American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. - Vol. 2, nº 2, January 2005 ; p. 77-85</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>