Defences : basic principles

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Seminario de Responsabilidad Civil de Productos (1980)</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1980</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Donación de AGERS</dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: There are two levels of defence to a product liability claim. The first is to challenge the basic justification for the claim by asking the courts to rule that the plaintiff has not established the essential conditions for a claim. In other words, before the manufacturer needs to seek legal defences he is entitled to ask the plaintiff to prove: That the product was unreasonably dangerous, that the defendant was in some way connected with the product, that the defect in te product was the cause of the plaintiff's injuries, etc.</dc:description>
<dc:format xml:lang="en">application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/100592.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>s.l]</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Gerencia de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Responsabilidad civil de productos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Conferencias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Reclamaciones</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Productos defectuosos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Instrumentos de defensa comercial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Documento AGERS</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Libros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Defences : basic principles</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">13 p. ; 30 cm</dc:format>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>