Best and worst of cross-channel design, 2009

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cam a22000004b 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20090056169</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20191202111851.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">090428s2009    usa||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">217</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Best and worst of cross-channel design, 2009</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Adele Sage... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Forrester Research</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2009</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">For Customer experience professionals</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The authors selected the top four firms in each of four industries and evaluated their multichannel experiences using Forresters  cross-Channel Review methodology. The methodology has three parts: 1) user goals that are representative of what target customers might want to accomplish witheach firm; 2) a set of 57 criteria that explicitly identify known types of user experience problems; and 3) trained analysts who examine the scenarios for their compliance with the 57 criteria. Two analysts tested and scored the experiences in each industry and then reviewed each others scores along with a third analyst before they were finalized</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080610326</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Distribución de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080609511</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cadenas de distribución</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602406</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Marketing estratégico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20190001328</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Márketing de la empresa de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20090013513</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sage, Adele</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080436582</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Forrester</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080528355</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">For Customer experience professionals</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>