Búsqueda

Best and worst of financial services brand building web sites, 2009

Recurso electrónico / electronic resource
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000cam a22000004b 4500
001  MAP20090101364
003  MAP
005  20220901134232.0
008  091127s2009 usa|||| ||| ||eng d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa‎$d‎MAP
084  ‎$a‎921.94
24510‎$a‎Best and worst of financial services brand building web sites, 2009‎$c‎by Ron Rogowski... [et al.]
260  ‎$a‎Cambridge‎$b‎Forrester Research‎$c‎2009
520  ‎$a‎How good is the overall experience offered by leading financial services brands Web sites in 2009? To find out, Forrester graded the sites of 16 top financial services brands using Forresters Web Site Brand Review methodology. Our tests measure how well top sites cater to user needs (Brand Action) and how well they infuse their Brand Image into the Web experience. We found that four companies sites differentiate themselves in both these dimensions: Discover, Progressive Casualty Insurance, Vanguard, and Wells Fargo. Unfortunately, we also found many problems on the sites we reviewed. Common Brand Action problems included poor text legibility, confusing category names, and missing or buried functionality. On the Brand Image side, sites were guilty of using fonts that werent consistent with other channels, poor production values, and lack of functionality to support brand positioning. To improve the online brand experience, financial services firms should map clearly defined brand attributes to user goals and ensure that brand comes through the entire site experience
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080603908‎$a‎Servicios financieros
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080609542‎$a‎Canales de distribución
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080547738‎$a‎Internet
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080617400‎$a‎Investigación de mercados
650 1‎$0‎MAPA20080571566‎$a‎Casos prácticos
650  ‎$0‎MAPA20080595296‎$a‎Comercio electrónico
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080648084‎$a‎Rogowski, Ron
7102 ‎$0‎MAPA20080436582‎$a‎Forrester