Global casualty insurance programmes : benchmarking report 2011

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cam a22000004b 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20120018549</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20120426162114.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">120426s2012    gbr||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Global casualty insurance programmes</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: benchmarking report 2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">London</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">AIRMIC</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2012</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">AIRMIC research</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of the survey is to create a benchmark that allows the risk management community, and casualty insurers, to track programme construction, administration and purchasing practices across businesses based in the UK. The analysis of survey results enables risk managers to compare their own insurance practices and programmes against similar organisations. While in most cases there are no right or wrong answers about structures or casualty risk management practices, benchmarking nonetheless provides an objective basis for evaluating individual approaches and for stimulating ideas about alternative approaches</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080598440</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Programas de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601799</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gestión de siniestros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601492</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estudios comparativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550592</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Encuestas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080433925</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">AIRMIC</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20120012882</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">AIRMIC research</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>