A Proposal for redesigning social security : long-term care pension
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20160003444</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20160205141240.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">160204e20160104esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">40</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20160002140</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Tanaka, Shuji</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
<subfield code="a">A Proposal for redesigning social security</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: long-term care pension</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Shuji, Tanaka</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">I propose to replace the automatic adjustment system of pension benefits, embedded in the 2004 reform of the Japanese public pension scheme, with one providing for specific required care levels and thus assure the logical financial adjustment of long-term care insurance and public pensions. For this purpose, I introduce a multi-state Markov chain model and estimate the transition matrix combining the existent local experience data and nationwide public data. The following policy effect will be anticipated. If an LTCI beneficiary falls into a certain required care status, his or her required care benefit will need to be upgraded and the individual expense burden will increase. A similar approach is proposed by annuity products in the private sector such as the QLAC (qualified longevity annuity contract) in the U.S. and life care pensions in Britain.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080604004</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Sistemas de pensiones</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080626181</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Reforma de la Seguridad Social</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080576783</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Modelo de Markov</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080555016</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Longevidad</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080603786</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de dependencia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080650919</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Japón</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077100215</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1018-5895</subfield>
<subfield code="g">04/01/2016 Volumen 41 Número 1 - enero 2016 , p. 98-117</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>