Digital due diligence : four questions to evaluate cyber insurance coverage
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20170009795</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20170328172019.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">170323e20170301esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">7</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20170003755</subfield>
<subfield code="a">White, Jennifer</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Digital due diligence</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: four questions to evaluate cyber insurance coverage</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Jennifer White </subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">With all the talk of the dangers of hacking and the importance of addressing the wide range of cyberrisks facing every organization, it is understandable that many have reached the point of cyber overload. Cyber and crime insurance policies have been so heavily recommended and purchased that many businesses are ready to move on once policies are placed. But the desire to just be done with it can cause a business to cut corners, which risks coverage, or allow unnecessary gaps in coverage, which risks the business. Ignoring the risk, or treating it as something that can be fully resolved, will only increase your company¿s exposure to potential loss. Therefore, it is important to consider the following four questions to make sure your cyber coverage is meeting your company¿s needs.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20160007633</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ciberriesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080586294</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mercado de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080601522</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Evaluación de riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000291</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Risk Management Magazine</subfield>
<subfield code="d">New York : Risk and Insurance Management Society, 1982-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0035-5593</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/03/2017 Volumen 64 Número 2 - marzo 2017 , p. 30-34</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>