Sex scandal : how the industry was shamed by the gender pay gap

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20180015564</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20230908091121.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">180523e20180501gbr|||p      |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">914</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20170003663</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Croucher, Martin</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Sex scandal</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: how the industry was shamed by the gender pay gap</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Martin Croucher</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">It was never going to go well. Even a year ahead of the results, industry figures were predicting that the industry would shame itself when the gender pay gap numbers were published. The results? The industry, and financial services more broadly, had mean averages of 25.9%, the worst of any sector. In terms of median, it was second worst behind construction at 22.1% compared to 24.8%. </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080571818</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Derecho laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080603045</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Principio de igualdad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080614263</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Igualdad entre los sexos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080576288</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Igualdad laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605155</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Condiciones de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586294</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mercado de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599218</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistemas financieros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605766</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Discriminación laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20210021831</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20170035732</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Insurance post</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London : Infopro Digital Insurance Information , 2016-2022</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">01/05/2018 Año 2018 Número 5 - mayo , p. 8-10</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>