Classification of chest radiografs for pneumoconiosis : a comparison of two methods of reading

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071017140</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418114935.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940203e19921201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800003063</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">873</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Classification of chest radiografs for pneumoconiosis</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: a comparison of two methods of reading</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">D.C.F. Muir... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of the present study was to determinate whether there would be any advantage, in terms of improved reader agreement, in reading and reporting the six lung zones separately rather than integrating all readings to produce a single classification for each film. The possible validity of evaluating the six zones separately was suggested by a previous study of the relation between radiographic appearances and underlying pathology in which a good correlation was found</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080455859</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">International Labour Organization</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080576615</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Medicina laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619480</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermedades profesionales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080556075</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Radiología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080545192</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Rayos X</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080566593</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Neumoconiosis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080051693</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Muir, D.C.F.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">British journal of industrial medicine</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">British journal of industrial medicine</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Margate</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 12, December 1992 ; p. 869-871</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>