Radiological safety by design : an inspector's viewpoint with reference to the design of gamma radiographic equipment. V

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071017233</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115000.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940209e19780801gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800003137</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">872</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080078997</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Murdoch, W.S.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Radiological safety by design</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: an inspector's viewpoint with reference to the design of gamma radiographic equipment. V</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">W.S. Murdoch</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">A brief review is given of the three basic designs of gamma radiographic equipment: the shutter, the torch and the remote control types. Analysis of failures of remote control cable projection equipment indicates that the main problem lies in the weakness of the cable conection. Suggestions are made for modifying the design of the equipment to eliminate the hazard associated with this weakness. It is concluded that one obstacle in radiological safety lies not in the lack of good designs, but in a resistance to change</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585679</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Higiene industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600488</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Contaminantes físicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608262</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Radiaciones ionizantes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080556075</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Radiología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080548124</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Medicina</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080560362</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Rayos gamma</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The Annals of occupational hygiene</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">The Annals of occupational hygiene</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Oxford [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 2, August 1978 ; p. 213-216</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>