Búsqueda

Comparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA

Fichero PDF / PDF file
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071018014
003  MAP
005  20080418115256.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  940315e19920601gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
035  ‎$a‎6800012636
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎872
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080273231‎$a‎Roberson, Kenneth T.
24510‎$a‎Comparison of asbestos air samples by SEM-EDXA and TEM-EDXA‎$c‎Kenneth T. Roberson, Thomas C. Thomas and Larry R. Sherman
520  ‎$a‎Because occupational air samples submitted to this laboratory for fibre counting often need to be confirmed as to the type of asbestos, random air samples were compared by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to determine if both methods yielded comparable resulsts. The results of this study revealed neither and advantage nor a disadvantage for confirmatory analyses of asbestos by either SEM or TEM. Several distinct characteristics were observed during the study
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080585679‎$a‎Higiene industrial
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080605278‎$a‎Contaminantes químicos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080542832‎$a‎Amianto
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080551797‎$a‎Muestreos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080537005‎$a‎SEM
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080537050‎$a‎TEM
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080537463‎$a‎EDXA
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080591960‎$a‎Métodos de análisis
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080601492‎$a‎Estudios comparativos
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080208578‎$a‎Thomas, Thomas C.
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080207045‎$a‎Sherman, Larry R.
7404 ‎$a‎The Annals of occupational hygiene
7730 ‎$t‎The Annals of occupational hygiene‎$d‎Oxford [etc.]‎$g‎nº 3, June 1992 ; p. 265-269