Is there a 'best compromise' shift system?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Folkard, Simon</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1992-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The evidence on the various problems reviewed by Wilkinson (in his article 'how fast should the night shift rotate?') is reconsidered. Other aspects of shift systems that were ignored by Wilkinson are then also taken into account. It is concluded that the evidence does not allow a general choice to be made between the use of either permanent night shifts or rapidly rotating, delaying, shift system. Rather the choice between them would appear to depend on the relative importance attached to safety and social problems in any given workplace</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/47144.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo por turnos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo nocturno</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Biorritmos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Tiempos de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ritmo circadiano</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Riesgo laboral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Aspectos sociales</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Is there a 'best compromise' shift system?</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London and Washington. - Vol. 35, nº 12, December 1992 ; p. 1453-1463</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>