Do-it-yourself inspections, Scandinavian style : self-inspections lead to safer workplaces and less absenteeism

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020542</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120254.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940715e19940501usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080115852</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Siler, Charles</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Do-it-yourself inspections, Scandinavian style</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: self-inspections lead to safer workplaces and less absenteeism</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Charles Siler</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">In most countries government regulators are the ones responsible for making sure that a company maintains a safe workplace. Not so in Scandinavian countries, where the rule of the day "self-regulation". The premise is that company managers and employees understand their business better than government bureaucrats or insurance adjusters, and that they know what's safe and what isn't. The system would seem to encourage corner-cutting. Often, however, companies use their freedom to develop detailed safety-and-health plants. It isn't and altruistic effort; better safety efforts can help decrease the expenses that often result from injuries and worker ailments</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629724</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602093</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Inspección de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080614942</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Prevención de accidentes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601522</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080546991</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080592271</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Paises escandinavos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Safety & health</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Safety & health</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Itasca</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 149, nº 5, May 1994 ; p. 70-74</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>