Strategies and tactics in fault diagnosis

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Morrison, David L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Duncan, Keith D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>International Ergonomics Association (1988: Sydney)</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1988-05-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Large individual differences in the ability to diagnose novel system failures are often noted in the research literature. Recent evidence suggest that measures of reflective cognitive styles may be good predictors of fault diagnosis performance. In this paper two experiments are described that are concerned with the development, identification and prediction of effective strategies amongst novice problems solvers</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/48277.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de fallos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Error humano</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estrategia empresarial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Cognición</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos experimentales</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Strategies and tactics in fault diagnosis</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London [etc.]. - Vol. 31, nº 5, May 1988 ; p. 761-784</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>