A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071020646 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418120318.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 940718e19881001gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 035 | $a6800013651 | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a875 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | $aA Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity$cLori J. Nebelsick-Gullett... [et al.] |
| 520 | $aThe purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between anaerobic work capacity (AWC) and anaerobic capacity (AC) from the Critical Power (CP) and Wingate tests, respectively. A secondary purpose was to determine the reliability of AWC and CP. The results of this study indicated that de CP test was a valid and reliable technique for determining anaerobic capabilities as well as the maximal rate of fatigueless work | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080550653$aErgonomía |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080570873$aTrabajo físico |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080575731$aEjercicio físico |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080595036$aCapacidad de trabajo |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080595029$aCapacidad anaeróbica |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080562243$aErgonometría |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080539948$aTests |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080363123$aNebelsick-Gullett, Lori J. | |
| 740 | 0 | $aErgonomics | |
| 773 | 0 | $tErgonomics$dLondon [etc.]$gVol. 31, nº 10, October 1988 ; p. 1413-1419 |