Multidimensional scaling as a method for assessing internal conceptual models of inspection tasks

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020796</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120351.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940728e19870601gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013735</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080127763</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Coury, Bruce G.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Multidimensional scaling as a method for assessing internal conceptual models of inspection tasks</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Bruce G. Coury</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Modelling the decision making component of inspection is hampered by an incomplete understanding of the way in which humans internally represent information about inspection tasks. This paper describes the use of multidimensional scaling (MDS) as a method for assessing the internal conceptual models used by inspectors. The results demonstrated the ability of the method to track the development of the decision maker's model during learning and revealed the relation between a well structured model and performance</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600389</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Comportamiento humano</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602116</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Inspección de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588434</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Toma de decisiones</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080559595</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Metodología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 30, nº 6, June 1987 ; p. 959-973</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>