Duration estimates and users'preferences in human-computer interaction

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071025898</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121313.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960927e19960101gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Duration estimates and users'preferences in human-computer interaction</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Joachim Meyer... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Two experiments assessed the effect of various static and dynamic computer 'wait' message displays on subjective estimates of the duration of intervals during which a subject had to wait for the computer's response, and subjective preferences among the different displays. The results demonstrate that the findings and models from earlier basic research on time estimation are relevant for predicting the subjective assessment of wait periods. However users'satisfaction with the displays depends not only on the aooarent duration of the wait period, but also on other variables. These should be considered when choosing the display that is shown while users wait for the system to complete a task</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608637</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistema hombre-máquina</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080559960</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ordenadores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540951</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrés</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080573522</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Psicofisiología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080604035</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistemas informáticos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080584771</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Diseño de sistemas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080571689</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Confortabilidad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080108694</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Meyer, Joachim</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 39, nº 1, January 1996 ; p. 46-60</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>