Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative">
<title>Ergonomics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" usage="primary" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080005191">
<namePart>Kanis, H.</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20080005191</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">gbr</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2000</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<form authority="marccategory">microform</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">This paper focuses on the analysis of deviation in findings within ergonomics-human factors research. The current terms used to address the analysis of deviation in empirical research revolve around the notion of validity. In E-HF research papers, "validity" is widely interpreted and includes its common parlance usage. The possibility is discussed that, with or without the help of these syntaxes, validation may become a method of inquiry; a productive means generating significant theoretical questions which bear directly on empirical work</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">H. Kanis</note>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080550653">
<topic>Ergonomía</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080588465">
<topic>Trabajo repetitivo</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080565626">
<topic>Factor humano</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080556891">
<topic>Validación</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080607289">
<topic>Métodos experimentales</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">875</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Ergonomics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>London and Washington</publisher>
</originInfo>
<part>
<text>Vol. 45, nº 12, December 2000 ; p. 1947-1965.</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">961030</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20080418123031.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20071501947</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>