Validating benefit and cost estimates : the case of airbarg regulation

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Thompson, Kimberly M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Segui-Gómez, María</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Graham, John D.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2002-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Preregulation estimates of benefits and cost are rarely validated after regulation are implemented. This article performs such a validation for mandatory automobile airbarg requirement. The authors suggest that airbag are reasoneble investment in safety, shows that the regulatory analysis tools do not always produce finding that are biased against health, safety, and environmental regulation</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/55091.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Airbag</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis costo-beneficio</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Valoración de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis costo-eficiencia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Seguridad vial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Casos prácticos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Validating benefit and cost estimates : the case of airbarg regulation</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk analysis : an international journal. - New York and London : Society for Risk Analysis. - Vol. 22, nº 4, August, 2002 ; p. 803-811</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>